Armstrong's Resource-Egalitarianism Theory and Attachment
The paper analyses the interrelationship between Armstrong’s egalitarian theory and his treatment of the ‘attachment theory’ of resources, which is the dominant rival theory of resources that his theory is pitched against. On Armstrong’s theory, egalitarianism operates as a default position, from which special claims would need to be justified, but he also claims to be able to incorporate 'attachment' into his theory. The general question explored in the paper is the extent to which ‘attachment’ claims can be ‘married’ to an egalitarian theory. The more specific argument is that a properly constrained attachment theory is more plausible than Armstrong’s egalitarian theory. It also criticizes attachment and improvement accounts as justifying permanent sovereignty over resources. The paper argues that neither of those arguments aim to justify the international doctrine of permanent sovereignty.
Armstrong, Chris. 2017. Justice and Natural Resources. An Egalitarian Theory Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kolers, Avery. 2009. Land, Conflict and Justice Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, Margaret. 2012. “Natural Resources, Territorial Right and Global Distributive Justice”, Political Theory, vol. 40, no. 1, 84-107.
Moore, Margaret. 2015. A Political Theory of Territory New York: Oxford University Press.
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pogge, Thomas. 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights Cambridge: Polity Press.
Simmons, A. John. 1994. The Lockean Theory of Rights Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wenar, Leif. 2016. Blood Oil Oxford: Oxford University Press.